0.11/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.12	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.12/0.32	% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
0.12/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.12/0.32	% WCLimit    : 240
0.12/0.32	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 03:29:34 EDT 2025
0.18/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.19/0.52	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KSHD0k6AlY/E---3.1_13835.p
0.54/0.90	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.54/0.90	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
0.54/0.90	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_ho_3 with 1200s (5) cores
0.54/0.90	# Starting pre_casc_2 with 240s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# Starting additional_ho_7 with 240s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# Starting lpo8_s with 240s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# new_ho_3 with pid 13913 completed with status 0
0.54/0.90	# Result found by new_ho_3
0.54/0.90	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
0.54/0.90	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_ho_3 with 1200s (5) cores
0.54/0.90	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.54/0.90	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-SSFFFFBN
0.54/0.90	# partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFFBN
0.54/0.90	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_bool_3 with 649s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_ho_3 with 121s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_bool_1 with 109s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_bool_4 with 109s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# Starting sh9 with 109s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# new_ho_3 with pid 13920 completed with status 0
0.54/0.90	# Result found by new_ho_3
0.54/0.90	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
0.54/0.90	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_ho_3 with 1200s (5) cores
0.54/0.90	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.54/0.90	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-SSFFFFBN
0.54/0.90	# partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFFBN
0.54/0.90	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_bool_3 with 649s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# Starting new_ho_3 with 121s (1) cores
0.54/0.90	# Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
0.54/0.90	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.54/0.90	
0.54/0.90	# Proof found!
0.54/0.90	# SZS status Theorem
0.54/0.90	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_sort1, type, secrecy_specID: $tType).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_sort2, type, secrecy_KS: $tType).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_sort3, type, set_Secrecy_specID: $tType).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_sort4, type, secrecy_Expression: $tType).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_sort5, type, secrecy_Keys: $tType).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_25, type, knowle945212990e_know: secrecy_specID > secrecy_KS > $o).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_41, type, bot_bo1785112429specID: set_Secrecy_specID).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_47, type, ine: secrecy_specID > secrecy_Expression > $o).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_59, type, secrecy_kE: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_Expression).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_62, type, secrecy_kKS: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_KS).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_73, type, insert1671894227specID: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_81, type, correctCompositionIn: secrecy_specID > $o).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_90, type, subcomponents: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_96, type, p: secrecy_specID).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_97, type, pq: secrecy_specID).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_98, type, q: secrecy_specID).
0.54/0.90	thf(decl_99, type, key: secrecy_Keys).
0.54/0.90	thf(fact_35_TBtheorem1a, axiom, ![X4:secrecy_specID, X18:secrecy_Expression, X5:secrecy_specID, X6:secrecy_specID]:(((ine @ X4 @ X18)=>((((ine @ X6 @ X18)|(ine @ X5 @ X18))<=(correctCompositionIn @ X4))<=((subcomponents @ X4)=(insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X6 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KSHD0k6AlY/E---3.1_13835.p', fact_35_TBtheorem1a)).
0.54/0.90	thf(fact_2_assms_I1_J, axiom, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ p @ (secrecy_kKS @ key))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KSHD0k6AlY/E---3.1_13835.p', fact_2_assms_I1_J)).
0.54/0.90	thf(fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine, axiom, ![X76:secrecy_specID, X77:secrecy_Keys]:((~((knowle945212990e_know @ X76 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X77)))=>~((ine @ X76 @ (secrecy_kE @ X77))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KSHD0k6AlY/E---3.1_13835.p', fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine)).
0.54/0.90	thf(fact_1_assms_I2_J, axiom, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ q @ (secrecy_kKS @ key))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KSHD0k6AlY/E---3.1_13835.p', fact_1_assms_I2_J)).
0.54/0.90	thf(fact_3_assms_I3_J, axiom, ((subcomponents @ pq)=(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KSHD0k6AlY/E---3.1_13835.p', fact_3_assms_I3_J)).
0.54/0.90	thf(conj_0, conjecture, ~((ine @ pq @ (secrecy_kE @ key))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KSHD0k6AlY/E---3.1_13835.p', conj_0)).
0.54/0.90	thf(fact_0_assms_I4_J, axiom, (correctCompositionIn @ pq), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KSHD0k6AlY/E---3.1_13835.p', fact_0_assms_I4_J)).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X4:secrecy_specID, X18:secrecy_Expression, X5:secrecy_specID, X6:secrecy_specID]:(((ine @ X4 @ X18)=>(((subcomponents @ X4)=(insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X6 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))=>((correctCompositionIn @ X4)=>((ine @ X6 @ X18)|(ine @ X5 @ X18)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_35_TBtheorem1a])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_8, plain, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ p @ (secrecy_kKS @ key)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_2_assms_I1_J])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X76:secrecy_specID, X77:secrecy_Keys]:((~(knowle945212990e_know @ X76 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X77))=>~(ine @ X76 @ (secrecy_kE @ X77)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_10, plain, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ q @ (secrecy_kKS @ key)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_1_assms_I2_J])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1501:secrecy_specID, X1502:secrecy_Expression, X1503:secrecy_specID, X1504:secrecy_specID]:((~(ine @ X1501 @ X1502)|(((subcomponents @ X1501)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X1503 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X1504 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))|(~(correctCompositionIn @ X1501)|((ine @ X1504 @ X1502)|(ine @ X1503 @ X1502)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_12, plain, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ p @ (secrecy_kKS @ key)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X1448:secrecy_specID, X1449:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X1448 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X1449))|~(ine @ X1448 @ (secrecy_kE @ X1449)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_14, plain, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ q @ (secrecy_kKS @ key)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X18:secrecy_Expression, X5:secrecy_specID, X4:secrecy_specID, X3:secrecy_specID]:(((ine @ X5 @ X18)|(ine @ X4 @ X18)|~((ine @ X3 @ X18))|((subcomponents @ X3)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X4 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))|~((correctCompositionIn @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((subcomponents @ pq)=(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_3_assms_I3_J])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (ine @ pq @ (secrecy_kE @ key)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_18, plain, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ p @ (secrecy_kKS @ key))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X3:secrecy_specID, X42:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X3 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X42))|~((ine @ X3 @ (secrecy_kE @ X42))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_20, plain, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ q @ (secrecy_kKS @ key))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X18:secrecy_Expression, X3:secrecy_specID]:(((ine @ p @ X18)|(ine @ q @ X18)|((subcomponents @ X3)!=(subcomponents @ pq))|~((ine @ X3 @ X18))|~((correctCompositionIn @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (ine @ pq @ (secrecy_kE @ key)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_23, plain, (correctCompositionIn @ pq), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_assms_I4_J])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_24, plain, ~((ine @ p @ (secrecy_kE @ key))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_25, plain, ~((ine @ q @ (secrecy_kE @ key))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_19])).
0.54/0.90	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_23])]), c_0_24]), c_0_25]), ['proof']).
0.54/0.90	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.54/0.90	# Parsed axioms                        : 446
0.54/0.90	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 143
0.54/0.90	# Initial clauses                      : 625
0.54/0.90	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 27
0.54/0.90	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 598
0.54/0.90	# Processed clauses                    : 2909
0.54/0.90	# ...of these trivial                  : 71
0.54/0.90	# ...subsumed                          : 1617
0.54/0.90	# ...remaining for further processing  : 1221
0.54/0.90	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 237
0.54/0.90	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.54/0.90	# Backward-subsumed                    : 10
0.54/0.90	# Backward-rewritten                   : 17
0.54/0.90	# Generated clauses                    : 9580
0.54/0.90	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8545
0.54/0.90	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.54/0.90	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 24
0.54/0.90	# Paramodulations                      : 9358
0.54/0.90	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.54/0.90	# NegExts                              : 0
0.54/0.90	# Equation resolutions                 : 258
0.54/0.90	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.54/0.90	# Total rewrite steps                  : 3146
0.54/0.90	# ...of those cached                   : 2674
0.54/0.90	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.54/0.90	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.54/0.90	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.54/0.90	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.54/0.90	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.54/0.90	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.54/0.90	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.54/0.90	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.54/0.90	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.54/0.90	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.54/0.90	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.54/0.90	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.54/0.90	# Current number of processed clauses  : 741
0.54/0.90	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 74
0.54/0.90	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
0.54/0.90	#    Negative unit clauses             : 21
0.54/0.90	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 637
0.54/0.90	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6568
0.54/0.90	# ...number of literals in the above   : 24259
0.54/0.90	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.54/0.90	# Current number of archived clauses   : 398
0.54/0.90	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 177983
0.54/0.90	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 62321
0.54/0.90	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1393
0.54/0.90	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 601
0.54/0.90	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.54/0.90	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 180
0.54/0.90	# BW rewrite match successes           : 130
0.54/0.90	# Condensation attempts                : 2909
0.54/0.90	# Condensation successes               : 6
0.54/0.90	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 184804
0.54/0.90	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 16668
0.54/0.90	
0.54/0.90	# -------------------------------------------------
0.54/0.90	# User time                : 0.315 s
0.54/0.90	# System time              : 0.013 s
0.54/0.90	# Total time               : 0.328 s
0.54/0.90	# Maximum resident set size: 5384 pages
0.54/0.90	
0.54/0.90	# -------------------------------------------------
0.54/0.90	# User time                : 1.421 s
0.54/0.90	# System time              : 0.058 s
0.54/0.90	# Total time               : 1.479 s
0.54/0.90	# Maximum resident set size: 2640 pages
0.54/0.90	% E exiting
0.54/0.90	% E exiting
2.89/0.90	EOF